NRL Fantasy 2023 Part 72 - Crazy Trade Time

robelgordo wrote:Tigers have signed the younger Fainu brothers, not the stabby one

The youngest one is on $500k a year from memory.

Is Matterson to Murray sideways? Or should I just go Matterson to Yeo?

Camo123 wrote:Latrell looks very tasty from next week

Run home of Tigers, Sharks, Dragons, Knights, Roosters, all terrible defences

Thanks for nothing mate.

Warner batting

danseels1985 wrote:Is Matterson to Murray sideways? Or should I just go Matterson to Yeo?

I think it’s a slight upgrade, presuming Murray plays at his best

The parra forward pack is stacked, even missing RCG,

South’s need every win so I see big mins for Murray

Khany wrote:Warner batting

Probably need to edit this post soon.

Anyone else in the house got AFB? Picked him up as a stop gap and keeping him as a POD (and cause I’m the type of idiot that never buys Yeo) could go pear shaped but could be fun.

Revraiser wrote:

Thanks for nothing mate.

What’s the deal with Colquhoun mate, good chance he hands around for the Sharkies for the rest of the season?

Khany wrote:Warner battling

FTFY

Welshy wrote:Hors over Haas? 1 v1 now until end of season?

Hors with the extra game?

The 1 extra game difference would assume you don't field anyone in the week Haas is on the bye.

7x Hors v 6x Haas and 1x???

Also anyone else line their trades up aesthetically in the app/desktop so it looks like everyone is a clear upgrade???
Eg
Tohu to Cleary
Sorenson to Murray
Simonsen to Garrick

(Sometimes I adjust it at the end of the week to ensure reversibility but mostly I forget which can cause issues)

Aardvark wrote:Also anyone else line their trades up aesthetically in the app/desktop so it looks like everyone is a clear upgrade???
Eg
Tohu to Cleary
Sorenson to Murray
Simonsen to Garrick

(Sometimes I adjust it at the end of the week to ensure reversibility but mostly I forget which can cause issues)

I always line them up by playing order and position so there's no fuckery with Fantasy's outdated trading system. They really need to just adopt SC/VSDT's system where you can update trades even if one side of the trade has locked (e.g. you're trading Turpin to Grant, and mid-round Grant gets ruled out, you could then just switch Grant for someone else who hasn't locked out, even if Turpin has locked out)

Ando wrote:

What’s the deal with Colquhoun mate, good chance he hands around for the Sharkies for the rest of the season?

Playing last game of the round is a pain.
I can see a late shuffle with Talakai starting edge and Colquhoun back to the bench.
Nothing to back it up, just a feeling.

Daedalus wrote:

The 1 extra game difference would assume you don't field anyone in the week Haas is on the bye.

7x Hors v 6x Haas and 1x???

Ming or NAS

Bethany_B wrote:

I always line them up by playing order and position so there's no fuckery with Fantasy's outdated trading system. They really need to just adopt SC/VSDT's system where you can update trades even if one side of the trade has locked (e.g. you're trading Turpin to Grant, and mid-round Grant gets ruled out, you could then just switch Grant for someone else who hasn't locked out, even if Turpin has locked out)

The less it becomes like SC the better. SC caters to casuals way too much

Revraiser wrote:

Thanks for nothing mate.

It’s alright you got the NRLW Sharks to cheer on

Terrible was maybe a bit strong for Sharks, susceptible probably a better description

Aardvark wrote:Also anyone else line their trades up aesthetically in the app/desktop so it looks like everyone is a clear upgrade???
Eg
Tohu to Cleary
Sorenson to Murray
Simonsen to Garrick

(Sometimes I adjust it at the end of the week to ensure reversibility but mostly I forget which can cause issues)

Little tino to Dce. Yeah it looks good.

Shady2K wrote:

The less it becomes like SC the better. SC caters to casuals way too much

Arbitrary difficulty from lazy coding doesn't make fantasy any better, it just makes it confusing and annoying.

Having SC's trade system wouldn't help casuals any more than it helps the serious players, in fact I would argue it benefits the serious players way more as the casuals don't usually use features like that to its full extent, similar to looping in fantasy.

Aardvark wrote:Also anyone else line their trades up aesthetically in the app/desktop so it looks like everyone is a clear upgrade???
Eg
Tohu to Cleary
Sorenson to Murray
Simonsen to Garrick

(Sometimes I adjust it at the end of the week to ensure reversibility but mostly I forget which can cause issues)

U think Sorensens a sell ? Or just top and tailing ?