NRL Fantasy 2023 Part 40 - Matt Broke My TV

Stats, Breakevens and more
https://footystatistics.com/

R9 Breakevens

Spoiler:

2023 Team planner
https://www.mediafire.com/file/e1ovaxv0tqj6lhz/2023+Team+Planner+v0.1.xlsm/file

Bye chart



Purple Monkey Dishwasher


2023 Autofill
https://www.nrlfantasyfanatics.com/t2068-2023-autofill-league

2023 Community Team
https://www.nrlfantasyfanatics.com/f12-celeb-community-team

2023 Fantasy Draft
https://www.nrlfantasyfanatics.com/t2069-nrlff-2023-fantasy-draft-league

2023 Fantasy Fantasy
https://www.nrlfantasyfanatics.com/t2088-fantasy-fantasy-2023

2023 Late Team Mail
https://www.nrlfantasyfanatics.com/t2106-nrl-team-lists-and-late-mail-2023

2023 Post of the Year nominations
https://www.nrlfantasyfanatics.com/t2145-2023-post-of-the-year-nominations

1st?

Slug

Bring back Fensom

hynes 100 when?

Contrastinghobby wrote:Tapine banner this week?

in 46 mins for flair

At what point is it regarded as bullying Matt? His contribution to the forum is class and I rate how he sticks to his principles but surely others are allowed to disagree / counter argue?

He's obviously very vocal about his fantasy ideas which is why he probably cops the backlash when things don't work out.

Might look at bringing Finucaine in if those two are going to be out for a while

I'll get you Mulvy

standard-issue wrote:

Nice one. Just know that we’re here for you next time you ditch us for a her. Nan has dementia so that could be an option.

Reklaw wrote:

Matt is literally the third best poster on here and the community would be shit without him

Krump wrote:
I really wish you’d state opinions instead of facts. There’s always heaps of people reading here and they need to see your team to know where your facts come from. I’m not saying that you’re wrong but fuck me you’re biased. Most of us don’t need Granville because our teams have a decent value, you just assume everyone is in the same position as you and shout shitty facts from the tree tops.

It's a paradox, for sure. I kinda agree with both to be honest. Scroll past if it's not your thing. Same goes for Daneels. If your criticism is that he only posts his team once a week, how hard is it to just scroll past it?

I won't name anyone, but if someone has ten great ideas out of 100 then that's bad for them, but good for me if I steal the 10 good ones. I appreciate it.

Ando wrote:At what point is it regarded as bullying Matt? His contribution to the forum is class and I rate how he sticks to his principles but surely others are allowed to disagree / counter argue?

He's obviously very vocal about his fantasy ideas which is why he probably cops the backlash when things don't work out.

Im a huge fan of Matt but I also hammer him. I’ve never seen someone speak so confidently about sport and that’s my issue. Matt speaks in facts not opinions.
He also takes the piss right out of fantasy choices that he hasn’t made. Saying lemonule is the latest that I remember, we aren’t picking on a defensless kid he talks plenty of shit himself

Tossing up whether I hold Turbo one more week and go to Drinky next week or whether I stick with Turbo to AJ. I usually don’t like bringing in a winger into my fantasy WFB’s at a solid price but maybe I should break that rule If I get AJ for him to score well I have to rely on tries coming over the next 8 weeks or so. (Our run does ease up a lot)……

standard-issue wrote:

Wrote a bit of a novel trying to answer this.  Deleted it all and settled for my original opening line-mattnz is one of the most important posters on here in my book.

100% that's my point. I like his posts even if I agree with a lot of what he says such as the pregame Granville chat tonight. But then the whole bullying card gets thrown about (not by Matt) which I don't think is fair especially with how often Matt pokes the bear with comments on players he doesn't own.

Ando wrote:At what point is it regarded as bullying Matt? His contribution to the forum is class and I rate how he sticks to his principles but surely others are allowed to disagree / counter argue?

He's obviously very vocal about his fantasy ideas which is why he probably cops the backlash when things don't work out.

Tonight was textbook for me, Granville had a last 3 average of around 35 points from around 60 minutes, and was an easily arguable and pretty popular in around here from what i saw, but then a select few want to turn around and frame it as a trade-in only an idiot would make with the benifit of hindsight for no other reason than to be complete pricks because matt picked him, I’ve noticed a few more popular posters here posting about their Granville-affected score without sharing the same fate.

Rabbits21 wrote:Tossing up whether I hold Turbo one more week and go to Drinky next week or whether I stick with Turbo to AJ. I usually don’t like bringing in a winger into my fantasy WFB’s at a solid price but maybe I should break that rule If I get AJ for him to score well I have to rely on tries coming over the next 8 weeks or so. (Our run does ease up a lot)……

I don't expect Drinkwater to return to career best form of last season, in a Cowboys team that is so down on form and confidence. Last week's game could end up being an anomoly for his season.