Bundy Mixer

easytiger wrote:Pelite's junk try was a great addition, I had thought the Tigers might throw in the towel a bit earlier.

In the end I went with;
Koroisau
Hale (B)
Olakau'atu
DCE (B)
Kelly
Pelite

Loading up on players that were playing both Tigers teams seemed to work well (pity I never even remotely considered Koula). It was nice to have turned things around this week.

ynot wrote:This week is interesting. Who do we play at EDG?

Pio played almost 70, but I think she was playing on the edge, not in the middle so her PPM was down a bit. Made a lot of metres, but missed a bunch of tackles, the pass she threw for the Tigers try was beautiful.

The men options at EDG are Harris, who is in a bit of doubt? But should be fine. Outside of that  Young, Sorensen, Nikora, EKat, Martin?

But then assuming you have Kelly at CTR and Berry/Pelite/Upton/Tonegato at WFB. McInnes/Grant at HOK. Cleary/Hynes HLF.

If you go for Pio you have to play a Men MID? Or Gagai over Kelly?

Camo123 wrote:

Frizell and Fitzgibbon are probably the best men EDGs behind Tohu

Roosters v Knights NRLW might also be a good chance to pivot

Rabbits21 wrote:Anyone going Ponga in Mixer?

FalconSloth wrote:I began the round in 5th place, currently in 6th but managed to avoid Tegan Berry. Currently; McInnes, Hale (c), Pio, Cleary (c), Kelly, Ponga

I’m tossing up between the  Pio (48 average ability to go low 40s and above 60) and  Ponga (high chance of going above 60) with Tohu Harris or another second rower (chance of going mid 40s with chance of going mid 50s or higher) and pelite (around 50? Who knows)

I’ve talked myself into Pio and Ponga with Pio posessing equal ability to match the men and Ponga having higher likelyhood to produce a score above 60 than the remaining women’s WFBs.

My current goal is to, reliably, score as many points each week consistently given the luxury of a high ranking. However, I’m curious as to how others are approaching the WFB/EDG dilemma and what PODs they are selecting to differ from the cookie cutter Mcinnes, Hale, ?, Cleary, Kelly, ?, teams.

FalconSloth wrote:I began the round in 5th place, currently in 6th but managed to avoid Tegan Berry. Currently; McInnes, Hale (c), Pio, Cleary (c), Kelly, Ponga

I’m tossing up between the  Pio (48 average ability to go low 40s and above 60) and  Ponga (high chance of going above 60) with Tohu Harris or another second rower (chance of going mid 40s with chance of going mid 50s or higher) and pelite (around 50? Who knows)

I’ve talked myself into Pio and Ponga with Pio posessing equal ability to match the men and Ponga having higher likelyhood to produce a score above 60 than the remaining women’s WFBs.

My current goal is to, reliably, score as many points each week consistently given the luxury of a high ranking. However, I’m curious as to how others are approaching the WFB/EDG dilemma and what PODs they are selecting to differ from the cookie cutter Mcinnes, Hale, ?, Cleary, Kelly, ?, teams.