NRLFF Survivor Season 2 - Part 3

Same. No reserves or all the teams would be the same.

Picking reserves where I can.

If the reserves force you to pick from one week then do that

Fark, back to drawing board

Hey FS,
Can you please read my DM?
Thanks
JM

Jumping Marlin
Nofo 15
Mbye 12
Latrell 1
Lomax 6
Harper 15
Wighton 10
Ilias 4
Ola 11
Matterson 9
NAS 19
Ofa 2
Tapine 20
Smith 18


Walsh 1
Naden 15
Townsend 4
Barnett 11
Lolo 20
Kenny 18

Papadontbleach
Hok Grant (1) Res: Verrils (1)
Mid Tapine (20), Haas (6), Taumalolo (18), Res Flegler (6)
Edg Nanai (7), Olakau'atu (11), Res Barnett (7)
Hlf Wighton (10), Ilias (4), Res Clifford (4)
Ctr Ramien (3), Schoupp (12), Res Mbye (12)
Wfb Tupou (Cool, Nofoaluma (15), Rapana (2), Res Milne (Cool

StuDogg101
HOK B Smith R18
MID J Tapine R20
MID P Haas R6
MID H Olakau'atu R11
EDG J Nanai R7
EDG R Matterson R9
HLF J Wighton R10
HLF C Munster R1
CTR A Schoupp R12
CTR J Ramien R3
WFB D Nofoaluma R15
WFB K Maumalo R19
WFB T Milne R8

HOK RES M Kenny R18 (Smith)
MID RES K Hetherington R6 (Haas)
EDG RES T Pangai Jr R9 (Matterson)
HLF RES B Trindall R1 (Munster)
CTR RES M Mbye R12 (Schoupp)
WFB RES M Montoya R8 (Milne)

Easytiger can’t win immunity due to the rule last round that an ineligible team meant you can’t win immunity this round (It didn’t seem like it was on purpose but the rule is the rule).
His team was:
POS Round Player
HOK 1 Harry Grant (suspended Round 1 — previous suspension)
MID 2 Joe Ofahengaue (Round 2 — Dangerous Throw, $1000 fine)
MID 6 Payne Haas (suspended Round 6 — breach notice)
MID 20 Joseph Tapine (Round 20 — Contrary Conduct, $1000 fine)
EDG 11 Haumole Olakau'atu (Round 11 — Crusher Tackle, $3000 fine)
EDG 9 Ryan Matterson (Round 9 — Contrary Conduct, $1000 fine)
HLF 10 Jack Wighton (suspended Round 9-10 — Dangerous Throw)
HLF 4 Chad Townsend (Round 4 — Careless High Tackle, $1000 fine)
CTR 12 Jesse Ramien (suspended Round 10-12 — Careless High Tackle)
CTR 14 Jordan Rapana (suspended Round 14 — Dangerous Contact)
WFB 8 Daniel Tupou (suspended Round 8 — Careless High Tackle)
WFB 15 David Nofoaluma (Round 15 — Dangerous Contact, $750 fine)
WFB 19 Ken Maumalo (Round 19 — Shoulder Charge, $1000 fine)

reserves:
HOK 1 Sam Verrills (suspended Round 1 — Careless High Tackle)
MID 20 Jason Taumalolo (Round 20 — Shoulder Charge, $3000 fine)
EDG 9 Mitch Barnett (suspended Round 4-9 — Dangerous Contact)
HLF 4 Jake Clifford (Round 4 — Careless High Tackle, $1000 fine)
CTR 12 Aaron Schoupp (Round 12 — Contrary Conduct, $1800 fine)
WFB 8 Taane Milne (suspended Round 8 — Careless High Tackle)

The rest had ineligible teams.

I should check to clarify more often but at the end of the day there wasn’t anything wrong or not black and white with the rules. If in doubt just follow them.

So we had to include all reserves?

Get fucked, if you cant be assed being around to answer questions about the challenge when you are posting shitty question in the fantasy thread then you cant go and exclude teams.

If we followed your very poorly thought out challenge all the teams would be the same.

Ive bit my tongue long enough, stick the game up your ass.

I quit.

I disagree with my team's ineligibility

BSmith rd18, (Kenny, rd18 )
Haas rd6, Tapine rd20, Ofahengaue rd2 (Barnett rd6 )
Nanai rd7, Matterson rd9 (TPJ rd9)
Munster rd1, Wighton rd10 (Trindall rd1 )
Ramien rd3, Naden rd15-rd18 (Harper rd15)
Tupou rd8, Nofo rd15, Young rd4 (Milne rd8 )

I selected Naden in my starting 13 for rd16 or rd17 eligibility according to the rule:
"If a player was suspended for multiple rounds denote any round over that period."

I selected Harper in my Reserves as he was charged the SAME round as Naden in rd15
Reserves must have been charged on the same round as one of the players in the same position.

I selected Nofo for rd15 in my starting 13 as per the regular rule.

The rules did not mention any restrictions on reserves except for being charged on the same round. Nofo, Naden, and Harper were all charged on the same round, and with Naden I was allowed to denote any round over that period accoring to the rules.

B/L wrote:Get fucked, if you cant be assed being around to answer questions about the challenge when you are posting shitty question in the fantasy thread then you cant go and exclude teams.

If we followed your very poorly thought out challenge all the teams would be the same.

Ive bit my tongue long enough, stick the game up your ass.

I quit.

I endorse this post.

Don't the door hit you on the way out B/L

FalconSloth wrote:
The rest had ineligible teams.

I should check to clarify more often but at the end of the day there wasn’t anything wrong or not black and white with the rules. If in doubt just follow them.

Mate, you don't even know your own rules for the challenges week to week and you change things on the fly when people ask questions that you haven't thought of or don't know the answer to.

Yes, you should check and clarify more often.  When you give updates a few hours before the deadline for the challenge, you can't expect people to know exactly what to do and then say teams aren't eligible at the finish line.  

I understand it's up to the contestants to follow the rules and submit teams accordingly, but at times you could check the teams and give people heads up if they have fucked something up.  Like I mean, I put zero effort into these challenges this year and partly due to the lack of communication and clarification during the week but on the occasion if I forgot a captain, a simple PM back saying, 'mate you've missed assigning a cappo, who do you want.'  That goes a long way, trust me.

Props to you for putting your hand up to run this, but it's obvious you have bitten off a lot more than you can chew.

The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:Don't the door hit you on the way out B/L

Who invited you?

wolfking wrote:

Who invited you?

All I can say Wolfking is if you don't appreciate the amount of time that Falcon Sloth has put in, then maybe you should get your head read.

wolfking wrote:

Who invited you?

I vaguely recall him being uninvited - it was quite some time ago.

I'm not sure I've ever come across someone that has so much to say yet adds so little

The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:

All I can say Wolfking is if you don't appreciate the amount of time that Falcon Sloth has put in, then maybe you should get your head read.

Cheers for the advice mate.

easytiger wrote:

I vaguely recall him being uninvited - it was quite some time ago.

I'm not sure I've ever come across someone that has so much to say yet adds so little

Yet he keeps posting shit.

wolfking wrote:

Yet he keeps posting shit.

https://www.nrlfantasyfanatics.com/spa/u339

Here it is... the almanac of shit dribbling - read it - there's a whole heap of time you will never get back in here

fascinating stuff