NRLFF Survivor Season 2 - Part 2

Chewie wrote:Also FS just to clarify, is this assumption correct:

2020 FRF = 2022 Survivor Retro MID

2020 2RF = 2022 Survivor Retro EDG

???

Good question, which also lends to the question;
How many FRF and 2RF (2 & 3 respectively in 2020 from memory?)

Get in my team Harry Grant

yeah I'm assuming we have this year's format, with FRF=MID and 2RF=EDG.
And RES & EMG positions of your choice (at your own risk)

Does the emergency players count in the 7mil cap or not?

Rabbits21 wrote:Does the emergency players count in the 7mil cap or not?

FS: you need to make a team of 21 with a salary cap of $7,000,000 (13 regular positions, 4 reserves that will score and 4 emergency players)


So YES they do count

Chewie wrote:yeah I'm assuming we have this year's format, with FRF=MID and 2RF=EDG.
And RES & EMG positions of your choice (at your own risk)

The problem as I see it is that in 2020 anyone playing 13/Lock was grouped into the 2RF position, whereas now that position is part of the MID - which is of course why we shifted from 3 * 2RF, 2 * FRF to 2 * EDG, 3 * MID

FS does say "positions are as shown on the link" - So to me that means we are working off FRF & 2RF positions which were always 2 FRF and 3 2RF in Fantasy?



What would make the most sense of course is if FS jumped on here every now and then and answered some questions...

OR if he's too busy/can't do that, then maybe a past player or helpful forum member might volunteer to take on the role of making decisions around challenge clarifications or even nominate a survivor player each week to make a decision on those assumptions/interpretations ??? what do you reckon FS?

I mean the challenge closes in 7 hours and a fairly key bit of information continues to remain unclarified - which seems to be the pattern every week....

As an interested observer, I think 3x2RF, 2xFRF makes most sense given the player classifications
(Jason Taumalolo and Jake Trbojevic 2RF only for example)

I created a team last night that was valid with either interpretation due to DPP. But I don't actually have anything riding on it so don't have to worry as much as others.

if FS/others are willing, I am happy to make decisions on clarifying contest rules.

As long as it restricted to technical rules around what a valid team is and nothing that might impact anything to do with the immunity/elimination aspect. Main preference would be Falcon doing it though, as sometimes contests have deliberate loopholes/funny business put in them and I don't want to go against his intent.

Milchcow wrote:if FS/others are willing, I am happy to make decisions on clarifying contest rules.

As long as it restricted to technical rules around what a valid team is and nothing that might impact anything to do with the immunity/elimination aspect. Main preference would be Falcon doing it though, as sometimes contests have deliberate loopholes/funny business put in them and I don't want to go against his intent.

IMO I think that would be ideal - thanks for offering Milch

I don't mind what the ruling is on anything challenge related, I imagine we all just want a level playing field and to know what will ultimately be a valid team/entry.
This 2RF v EDG count for instance is a pretty significant ruling in terms of team setup/validity.


I respect it's FS's decision - but if we don't hear from him, I wonder if this week if both interpretations are ruled as valid? (given people may have already submitted teams)

I agree there is too much confusion around challenges and not enough clarification

Avo out shit there goes my centre

easytiger wrote:

The problem as I see it is that in 2020 anyone playing 13/Lock was grouped into the 2RF position, whereas now that position is part of the MID - which is of course why we shifted from 3 * 2RF, 2 * FRF to 2 * EDG, 3 * MID

FS does say "positions are as shown on the link" - So to me that means we are working off FRF & 2RF positions which were always 2 FRF and 3 2RF in Fantasy?



What would make the most sense of course is if FS jumped on here every now and then and answered some questions...

OR if he's too busy/can't do that, then maybe a past player or helpful forum member might volunteer to take on the role of making decisions around challenge clarifications or even nominate a survivor player each week to make a decision on those assumptions/interpretations ??? what do you reckon FS?

I mean the challenge closes in 7 hours and a fairly key bit of information continues to remain unclarified - which seems to be the pattern every week....

Everyone just select Tino as your MID/EDG dual....

Fixed!

Chewie wrote:

Everyone just select Tino as your MID/EDG dual....

Fixed!

I currently have him there in my draft anyway all solved!

I for one welcome our new cow overlord.

B/L wrote:I for one welcome our new cow overlord.

yeah if you don't submit a team it doesn't really matter what the rules are