NRL Supercoach 2021

Ozymandias wrote:Well, after the high of captain Papy's 4-try explosion I came down to Earth with a bump as Fogarty ended up with a zero

That will get you an EM won't it? Might be better than zero.

Hannah2 wrote:

That will get you an EM won't it? Might be better than zero.

Unfortunately not ....

The remaining players on your Substitutes list don't score, unless an automatic emergency is required to replace ONE zero-scoring player in your Starting 17 who didn't play.

.... if you play and get a zero then it's just bad luck.

Cook VC tonight along with Riki & Niu on field.

I’m playing someone in my work league who has, and captained, Alex Johnstone.

I'm trying to free money for Grant. I have AFB who is injured so thinking of trading for Zane Musgrove.

His BE is 13, so he should make money, but I'm not sure of his security, and he is likely to be suspended.
Any thoughts? Is there a better choice around same money or a bit more?

Hannah2 wrote:I'm trying to free money for Grant. I have AFB who is injured so thinking of trading for Zane Musgrove.

His BE is 13, so he should make money, but I'm not sure of his security, and he is likely to be suspended.
Any thoughts? Is there a better choice around same money or a bit more?

Not sure if you have him, Ryan James is someone I'd look at. Minutes are consistent.

WT2K wrote:

Not sure if you have him, Ryan James is someone I'd look at. Minutes are consistent.

Yeah, thanks, I have him.
Just a bit worried re Musgrove, not sure why, lol

Hannah2 wrote:

Yeah, thanks, I have him.
Just a bit worried re Musgrove, not sure why, lol

I don't trust him with suspensions! Coach does like Musgrove though.

Anyone not bringing Walker in (those who don't already have him)?

I'd made it through the whole day avoiding it as I just couldn't bring myself to trade Brooks out. He's been scoring very well and still has a low BE. The complete definition of someone I would never trade out under normal circumstances.

Just checked what Walker's BE is, though, and it's -105??? How's that even possible? Anyway, I reversed my trades and very unwillingly traded out Brooks for Walker. Hated doing it but I guess it has to be done, innit?

Teeth Eater wrote:Anyone not bringing Walker in (those who don't already have him)?

I'd made it through the whole day avoiding it as I just couldn't bring myself to trade Brooks out. He's been scoring very well and still has a low BE. The complete definition of someone I would never trade out under normal circumstances.

Just checked what Walker's BE is, though, and it's -105??? How's that even possible? Anyway, I reversed my trades and very unwillingly traded out Brooks for Walker. Hated doing it but I guess it has to be done, innit?

I already have Walker, so no decision here, but I think you've done the right thing, and think of all the extra points you can score with that extra money. You'll be able to afford another gun!

Hannah2 wrote:

I already have Walker, so no decision here, but I think you've done the right thing, and think of all the extra points you can score with that extra money. You'll be able to afford another gun!

Yeah, I must do something with my front row next week, I think.

Got the peach in this week. Flicked Roberts.

Brought in walker and condom for the cash

Finally brought in D.Fifita. Flicked Mead and Faas for Fifita and Condon

Got Papenhuyzen and Tino not playing, and my depth is mediocre. CTW  is Capewell, Staines, Opacic, Laurie, Nui, Simonsson and nuff, so no cover this round. Thinking Liddle to Grant and Tino to someone: $513 000 either 2RF or CTW. Any suggestions?

I have only $513 000, so can't afford Too or Nofo, if I get Grant

Hannah2 wrote:Got Papenhuyzen and Tino not playing, and my depth is mediocre. CTW  is Capewell, Staines, Opacic, Laurie, Nui, Simonsson and nuff, so no cover this round. Thinking Liddle to Grant and Tino to someone: $513 000 either 2RF or CTW. Any suggestions?

Luke Thompson

Yes, I looked at Luke Thompson, good BE set to make some $$ is there a downside?

Hannah2 wrote:Yes, I looked at Luke Thompson, good BE set to make some $$ is there a downside?

Don't think there's too much downside, named at prop instead of lock but I think he still sees the same minutes

WT2K wrote:

Don't think there's too much downside, named at prop instead of lock but I think he still sees the same minutes

Thanks, I think that's what I'll do.