Now wondering if I should grab a Kiraz/Niu while the trades are free so I can move him to 18-21 next week
Last edited by Liverpool_Bulldog on Fri Mar 08, 2024 7:34 am; edited 1 time in total
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Snatchpato wrote:I’m 8/283 but considering one was a 0 I think it seems fine.
That also includes two injury affected Roosters and a centre (5/8 )who barely touched the ball last night.
Rabbits21 wrote:
I am stoked mate given their pack played like a bunch of girls in skirts. Was powder puff stuff.
rhinoceroo wrote:
You'll know Bateman was an old-school razzle-dazzle 13 all the way through Bradford and Wigan then.
GreenSchist wrote:
I'm 11/439 with captain Cleary, McInnes, Hutch, Luki Paps and Kleese still to come.
Rubbish score but can't get too worked up about the flops. Every competitive team had Piakura and Strange (the smart ones probably had him in reserves). Sitili was unlucky, Ponga struggled but still got 35. He will be better.
On the bright side, Hosking, Rapana and Smithies worked out well enough, as did Cheese and Turbo from last week.
Ultimately gonna be a low score for this round but I'm pretty happy with the thought process and decision making to start the season. No absolute fires to put out (yet).
kamikamicameleons wrote:Am I right in thinking hat and average score for round 1 should be ~740?
Logic being 1-17 spend for most teams will be ~$9m. $9m/$13.5k pp = 666. Add on an extra 70 for captain double points and you get 736.
Just interested in how my team is tracking. Currently 277/8, including Piakura. Not great, but only had one gun play so far
BCT05 wrote:I think the extent of my fantasy decisions for the rest of the round is which one to play out of Chan, Flanagan and Salmon... exciting stuff.
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
Currently sitting on 11/544 but that’s with Cappy Haas leading the way. Apart from Cleary, the remaining guys could all be absolutely anything score wise. At least there are some decent points on the board
easytiger wrote:
You only have to play one of them?
I must've done something wrong
easytiger wrote:
Well that's an interesting way to mark international women's day.
Maybe next time before you use "girls" as some sort of negative floor for performance, you think about what would happen if you tried to run around Georgia Hale in a game, or maybe tried to tackle Mele Hufanga, Millie Boyle or Isabelle Kelly just as a few examples.
Yesterday I was fortunate enough to coach some kids playing rippa rugby for the first time.
On field the teams are 7 aside, but require to always have at leasts 3 girls on - because of lower participation, that means the girls have to work harder and play the whole game without a break. But they don't let that deter them, they don't drop in determination or effort, they work hard in defence and show speed and agility that is easily equal to their male counterparts.
They also have to deal with this kind of sexist bullshit, so in future can we please just be a bit better, and not go there?
Thanks, end rant
easytiger wrote:
Well that's an interesting way to mark international women's day.
Maybe next time before you use "girls" as some sort of negative floor for performance, you think about what would happen if you tried to run around Georgia Hale in a game, or maybe tried to tackle Mele Hufanga, Millie Boyle or Isabelle Kelly just as a few examples.
Yesterday I was fortunate enough to coach some kids playing rippa rugby for the first time.
On field the teams are 7 aside, but require to always have at leasts 3 girls on - because of lower participation, that means the girls have to work harder and play the whole game without a break. But they don't let that deter them, they don't drop in determination or effort, they work hard in defence and show speed and agility that is easily equal to their male counterparts.
They also have to deal with this kind of sexist bullshit, so in future can we please just be a bit better, and not go there?
Thanks, end rant
lukeayee wrote:
Would you have a problem if he said "tackeld like a bunch of skirts"?
Do women in skirts tackle harder then men in shorts?
What about men In skirts tackling softer than men in shorts?
What about tackled like a bunch of soft cocks or is that offensive to men over 50?
Help me with the line.
lukeayee wrote:
Would you have a problem if he said "tackeld like a bunch of skirts"?
Do women in skirts tackle harder then men in shorts?
What about men In skirts tackling softer than men in shorts?
What about tackled like a bunch of soft cocks or is that offensive to men over 50?
Help me with the line.
Rabbit wrote:
Smithies will be better than Bateman in every regard.
OB wrote:
You've got the rest of the English language at your disposal. Be creative. Don't be a dick.
Rabbit wrote:
Smithies will be better than Bateman in every regard.