NRL Fantasy 2023 Part 31 - So many trade out options, but no trade in ones

Holzman wrote:WFB is a real problem at the moment.

Sloan Warbrick dropping bad scores.

Walsh To'o look good options but then

Turbo Teddy will be better value in 1-2 weeks.

Latrell has shown also that the guns can hit a high BE.

actually thinking Teddy might be the guy I pick up this week over Walsh, To'o etc...

Lots of value for origin players now or coming up. Not sure how to balance with origin duties.

Cook, Murray, Jurbo, Teddy, To'o, L Mitchell, Cotter, Scrit, Tino

All of the above are about as cheap as they will get (Other then Teddy).

I want them all now.

I mean I knew Nicho was expensive, but wow - anyone know what that equates to as a points average

lukeayee wrote:

Lots of value for origin players now or coming up. Not sure how to balance with origin duties.

Cook, Murray, Jurbo, Teddy, To'o, L Mitchell, Cotter, Scrit, Tino

All of the above are about as cheap as they will get (Other then Teddy).

I want them all now.

I am avoiding all of them, finding the non-origin players that can score well in those positions.

Rabbits21 wrote:
He’s out 4 weeks again.

What's the diagnosis on ITT?

BCT05 wrote:Ugh Brailey out is super annoying, I don't particularly like any of the hooker options.

Koro probably best value but would need to wait for next week and play Boyd. Might have to settle for JMK. Unless I do just get Cheese for now...

Maybe going for a gun HOK rather than Beanz is the POD move to make. While everyone else is stick with Cheese/Liddle/Hodgson etc you could be pumping out scores by Grant/Cook. Cleary is scoring just fine as a C option

Holzman wrote:WFB is a real problem at the moment.

Sloan Warbrick dropping bad scores.

Walsh To'o look good options but then

Turbo Teddy will be better value in 1-2 weeks.

Latrell has shown also that the guns can hit a high BE.

actually thinking Teddy might be the guy I pick up this week over Walsh, To'o etc...

Teddy should only drop around 25k with a 55 so he’s almost bottomed out

I think given (if he doesn’t get injured) he should be a minimum 20-25 point upgrade on Sloan/Warbrick it’s worth the minor cash sacrifice

filthridden wrote:

Don't think he ever had DPP. Only a CTR in the team tracker. Didn't get a start til rd3. Should get DPP now though you'd think.

Oh ok, I’ll give myself an uppercut. Thought he was DPP to start the season.

Camo123 wrote:

Teddy should only drop around 25k with a 55 so he’s almost bottomed out

I think given (if he doesn’t get injured) he should be a minimum 20-25 point upgrade on Sloan/Warbrick it’s worth the minor cash sacrifice

Yeah think ill go Hopgood to Teddy

might even go Sloan to Walsh/To'o on top

Im H2H so dont care about byes.

The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:

Maybe going for a gun HOK rather than Beanz is the POD move to make. While everyone else is stick with Cheese/Liddle/Hodgson etc you could be pumping out scores by Grant/Cook. Cleary is scoring just fine as a C option

That or go with Soni Luke on the basis that Kenny might get dropped soon?

What’s the consensus on Crossland? Does he get one more start in the halves this week? Is he first choice hooker option when Ponga gets back? Weighing up my options between him, McInnes, Couchman, possibly Sele, and a host of others.

Btw, as good as $0 looked, and as telling as it is regarding Manly’s right edge, I don’t think I can be comfortable any longer with Warbrick in my 17, I’m potentially looking at:

Hopgood>Matto
Carrigan>????
Warbrick>Walsh

Crossland leaves me $312K, the other options a bit less.

easytiger wrote:

I mean I knew Nicho was expensive, but wow - anyone know what that equates to as a points average  

Glad I got him in at 1,008,000 already this morning. Tempted to bank the 800k now though.

All the hopgood owners jumping off now ?

Thinking of going

Hopgood , brailey , itt
To
Robson , ekatoa , Kris

The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:

That or go with Soni Luke on the basis that Kenny might get dropped soon?

Sorensen back to bench and when JFH returns probably means less middle mins for Kenny and therefore less mins for Soni Luke?

Howdy Y'All,

Haven't had much time this year to do a long look at stats, but with the general crop of common WFBs and CTRs performing like roadkill armadillo last round, it really hurt if you didn't have Hammer and/or Walsh and were relying on the likes of Warbrick, ITT, Sloan, Perham (or maybe all of them). Problem this year has been players sustaining unsustainable scoring. So here's an interesting one.

In games over 60mins:
Player 1 = 46.3 Ave (6.3 TK, 4.8 TB, 1.3 OH, 204 MG, 4 pts/p/g from T/TA/LB/LBA). High of 51, Low of 41.
Player 2 = 48.7 Ave (5.7 TK, 4.7 TB, 0 OH, 156 MG, 17 pts/p/g from T/TA/LB/LBA). High of 65, Low of 28.

There's $103k between the two. Who would you rather?

It's a good feeling having the Cleary & Hynes combo...

Team after trades:
Grant
Haas, Tapine, Ford
Hosking, EKatoa
Cleary, Hynes
Bird, Alamoti
Miller, HTF, CNK

SJ, Preston, Carty, Sloan
Knik, IKatoa, Couchman, HSS

Hoping HSS will be benched again so I can shuffle players around to my liking

BCT05 wrote:

Gamble is back this week and sounds like he will be back into halves with Crossland and Mann sharing hooker

Right. That guy who at one time had one of the worst haircuts ever.

I’d like it to be Crossland starting and moving to the middle when Mann comes on. If one of Johns or Croker make their 17, it’s likely CrossMann minutes could be split more evenly? No idea. It helps to type whilst I think.

MayorofAlburquerque wrote:Howdy Y'All,

Haven't had much time this year to do a long look at stats, but with the general crop of common WFBs and CTRs performing like roadkill armadillo last round, it really hurt if you didn't have Hammer and/or Walsh and were relying on the likes of Warbrick, ITT, Sloan, Perham (or maybe all of them). Problem this year has been players sustaining unsustainable scoring. So here's an interesting one.

In games over 60mins:
Player 1 = 46.3 Ave (6.3 TK, 4.8 TB, 1.3 OH, 204 MG, 4 pts/p/g from T/TA/LB/LBA). High of 51, Low of 41.
Player 2 = 48.7 Ave (5.7 TK, 4.7 TB, 0 OH, 156 MG, 17 pts/p/g from T/TA/LB/LBA). High of 65, Low of 28.

There's $103k between the two. Who would you rather?

Player 1. And I would assume played 1 is cheaper?

MayorofAlburquerque wrote:Howdy Y'All,

Haven't had much time this year to do a long look at stats, but with the general crop of common WFBs and CTRs performing like roadkill armadillo last round, it really hurt if you didn't have Hammer and/or Walsh and were relying on the likes of Warbrick, ITT, Sloan, Perham (or maybe all of them). Problem this year has been players sustaining unsustainable scoring. So here's an interesting one.

In games over 60mins:
Player 1 = 46.3 Ave (6.3 TK, 4.8 TB, 1.3 OH, 204 MG, 4 pts/p/g from T/TA/LB/LBA). High of 51, Low of 41.
Player 2 = 48.7 Ave (5.7 TK, 4.7 TB, 0 OH, 156 MG, 17 pts/p/g from T/TA/LB/LBA). High of 65, Low of 28.

There's $103k between the two. Who would you rather?

I would go player 1