NRL Fantasy 2021 Part 87 - Fifita is a bust edition

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
Oops drunk fingered ya Rev.

I do apologise

Ohh gee, wish I could say I hadn't heard that before....

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:God this Brailey v Walsh decision is hard to make. 

Walsh’s scores have been so erratic, even with a try last week was pants. Brailey could get a rest if Randall stays on but at least ya can bank a 45-50 on a standard day

Yeah I know mate, I couldn't really make up my mind when talking about it the other day either.

Brailey's attacking stats have dried up completely since Rd 12, but against Dogs is as good an opportunity as any. He's managed to hit some mid 50s without them recently. Randall's presence gave me a pause at first, but with no DSaifiti and Frizell, he might just be there to plug a hole in rotations.

I kinda defaulted to playing Brailey since Walsh is a WFB, but isn't as clearcut between HK and WFB this season.

Does Walsh carve up the Broncos because he knows them, or do they shut him down because they know him? Or is it totally irrelevant? Probably

I tipped Broncos, but don't feel good about it. Tough one to predict.

WT2K wrote:
Sharks have it in the bag

Tigers by plenty.

standard-issue wrote:

We didn’t stay mate, the horses were tired and we had a game of croquet scheduled on the front lawns.

Got pics actually

standard-issue wrote:

We didn’t stay mate, the horses were tired and we had a game of croquet scheduled on the front lawns.

Croquet on the FRONT lawn? You sir are sixpence short of a shilling!

I tipped Sharks in this one. Tipped Tigers the last 3 and 2/3 ain't bad. Rare for us to win 2 in a row, let alone 3.

It is the end of the season though and our eyes are on the prize. The 9th place prize that is.

Cookie Monster wrote:


There's something in the looping thread for you Wolfie

Thanks mate, you're a genius. Worried if they both score well though haha.

wolfking wrote:

Thanks mate, you're a genius.  Worried if they both score well though haha.

Thing I have to weigh up is if I look both, Verrills plays regardless. Hmmm....

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:

Revraiser wrote:When it's on the line and it is Tigers v Sharks, I get runny loins type feelings... don't feel good about today.

Oops drunk fingered ya Rev.

I do apologise

Peanut butter and jelly over here.

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:God this Brailey v Walsh decision is hard to make. 

Walsh’s scores have been so erratic, even with a try last week was pants. Brailey could get a rest if Randall stays on but at least ya can bank a 45-50 on a standard day

I'd probably go Brailey.

WT Winfield wrote:

Yeah I know mate, I couldn't really make up my mind when talking about it the other day either.

Brailey's attacking stats have dried up completely since Rd 12, but against Dogs is as good an opportunity as any. He's managed to hit some mid 50s without them recently. Randall's presence gave me a pause at first, but with no DSaifiti and Frizell, he might just be there to plug a hole in rotations.

I kinda defaulted to playing Brailey since Walsh is a WFB, but isn't as clearcut between HK and WFB this season.

Does Walsh carve up the Broncos because he knows them, or do they shut him down because they know him? Or is it totally irrelevant? Probably

I tipped Broncos, but don't feel good about it. Tough one to predict.

Think I’m gonna back a Brailey try and hope for the best haha.
Yeah I’m of the opinion that Randall is there to help out in the middle.

Will see how it pans out on Sunday night

Kennedy and Tracey about to rip the tigers apart. Tune in.

So anyone ever enquired how many games fox call via the studio per round ?

WT2K wrote:Kennedy and Tracey about to rip the tigers apart. Tune in.

Wolfie, weight in here pls. As to how the Tigers are going to rip it up today.

Tigers by 40.

Happy to be wrong though.

This game was supposed to be in Tamworth. Fuck all y'all covid carrying bastards.

Rabbits21 wrote:
I’m very worked up about it. 

Some points I picked up watching the 2nd half. 

We’ve certainly been screwed.

Early 2nd half Burton takes Sauce high a metre from the line. No penalty 

Next tackle Cody grubbers and host is poleaxed by a Cleary escort.....again no penalty. We had them in the rack

not long after, Cook legitimately gets ball when there’s no dummy half. Capewell moved off the mark. Wrongly penalised 

Panthers Forward pass from dummy half in the play where sauce gets penalised for escort which had no effect on the play unlike the Cleary one on us moments earlier....why?

somehow the ref Plucked a high tackle penalty against walker out of his arse when it wasn’t 

Questionable penalty against Tom to level the scores. He draped the armver the shoulder. Many others in the game similar not penalised 

Luai offside when forcing goal line restart

60% possession to them at the 20 minute mark through no fault of our. We’ve been very good defensively 

Downtown penalty with 18 to go was the bunker imposing itself for no reason. When was the last time we saw that penalty given?

Sauce drops the bomb with 16 to go. ouch. He had actually been good until then

14 minutes remaining leota clearly runs a shepherd leading to the try. Often theses are disallowed 

12 to go. Luai offside then chases and drops knees into sauces head. Should have been Our penalty 

9 to go, walker smashed high by offside Cleary. Restart instead of penalty we should have been down in their 20m

Field goal. Yeo & Crichton downtown blockers but that’s ok?

This is why you're my favourite poster, the extreme lengths you go to to justify your team's loss is unrivalled worldwide.

filthridden wrote:

standard-issue wrote:

We didn’t stay mate, the horses were tired and we had a game of croquet scheduled on the front lawns.

Croquet on the FRONT lawn? You sir are sixpence short of a shilling!

If I recall correctly, it was around the time we had a particularly bad season of Bean Fly getting into the legumes, so much so it was intolerable even to venture into the rest of the property, let alone partake in sporting dalliances.