NRL Fantasy 2024 Part 15 - 1 week ban for any fantasy related posts on P51

Mulvy wrote:Seriously, though.

Get fucked, Kiraz intercepted a Sharks pass. Clear TO.

He intercepted it on the full, dropped it backwards, and regathered it. It's a TO for fucksake.

rhinoceroo wrote:

Sounds like you escaped a kncok-on to me

Mulvy wrote:Seriously, though.

Get fucked, Kiraz intercepted a Sharks pass. Clear TO.

He intercepted it on the full, dropped it backwards, and regathered it. It's a TO for fucksake.

Ando wrote:

Sounds like you traded Kiraz > Smithies

Ando wrote:

Sounds like you traded Kiraz > Smithies

Ando wrote:

Sounds like you traded Kiraz > Smithies

Rabbit wrote:

The more I look at your avatar, the more tempted I am to start Galvin over Levi. The ultimate sub gun pod.

rhinoceroo wrote:

I'd definitely play him over Levi. Question is whether to play him over Salmon's 31. What's the best/worst that could happen with an unseen Tigers half? Will probably do it. #fun

Shady2K wrote:

Penis didn’t get much good ball either, just out of yardage. Play kept stopping at Moses or Matterson

Milchcow wrote:It was probably discussed during the match, but just saw the Kikau no-try.

What pisses me off is Blocker saying it should be a try because people can't tackle Kikau close to the line and it was going to be a try.
If that was the case, why don't the bulldogs just give it to Kikau close to the line every time, seeing as its almost impossible to tackle him - surely he'll score multiple tries every week.

rhinoceroo wrote:No Cleary update, what the fuck. They've even left him hanging there on 99 metres gained.

Milchcow wrote:It was probably discussed during the match, but just saw the Kikau no-try.

What pisses me off is Blocker saying it should be a try because people can't tackle Kikau close to the line and it was going to be a try.
If that was the case, why don't the bulldogs just give it to Kikau close to the line every time, seeing as its almost impossible to tackle him - surely he'll score multiple tries every week.

Chucky wrote:

Milchcow wrote:It was probably discussed during the match, but just saw the Kikau no-try.

What pisses me off is Blocker saying it should be a try because people can't tackle Kikau close to the line and it was going to be a try.
If that was the case, why don't the bulldogs just give it to Kikau close to the line every time, seeing as its almost impossible to tackle him - surely he'll score multiple tries every week.

The biggest issue here is that you’re listening to Blocker.
For clarity, you may be able to YouTube Milo Kerrigan and get a better understanding of what’s occurring.

standard-issue wrote:

Yep, FOX have kept him around all these years purely to appeal to the old school crowd.