You can probably end the post there tbh.
First you're banging on about the defender being absolved of responsibility
Then all the responsibility is on the defender
First Ofa is sliding into the tackle
Then he's dropping into the tackle
Its like watching a dissociative identity mental case have an argument with himself and, somehow, both personalities are losing.
yes sweetie, you already posted that I fucked up when I posted before - well done on posting it twice. Oops, I mixed a couple of words up. Also, as I said before if you are going on the wording from the NRL rules, with Napa - He was the attacker and Sims was the defender. So am I right or wrong? lol
Yep - to reiterate (ill post it again bud, you like that) with the calls this year - apparently we cant blame the bloke with the ball at all, so the responsibility relies on the tackle maker to not do something careless, reckless or even accidental that injures the guy with the ball. It was dangerous, that was the whole argument with Napa, and what the bronco defender did in this situation was also clearly dangerous consider the only part of his body to make contact was the knee with the head of Trbo.
also, what the actual fuck did you watch. He comes in in a sliding motion and then lands on trbos face Split the posts up again mate. land, drop, slide, collide, KNEE IN THE HEAD, hit, smack, knock - there ya go a few more for ya to attempt to crack a funny with. You know you are spot when when the muppet has to pick a grammatical error or use of an incorrect word to try and get one up on ya. Should get me on spelling and apostrophes next maate! Never be correct in the Bronco thread, a couple of you muppets aren't accustomed to seeing logic and accurate comments about footy, as well as valid criticisms. Just go back to downvoting my posts mate at least you were good at that.
My personal opinion is that I dont think it was a penalty, just like Napa's first one shouldn't have been a penalty - but fuck me they could show some consistency with the calls.