VSDT 2024

I know it may be a dumb move but Cook > Lussick is on the cards for me this week, need to free up some cash.

Aardvark Ratnick wrote:I know it may be a dumb move but Cook > Lussick is on the cards for me this week, need to free up some cash.

I don't think it's dumb. lussick scoring well enough to that you probably don't lose too many points there over the long term plus the cash helps get rid of dud cows.

Was bringing in Hosking for his increase in price but being named on the bench means trading him out earlier than I wanted to. Will his price rises over the next few rounds be worth the 2 trades??

code delta wrote:Was bringing in Hosking for his increase in price but being named on the bench means trading him out earlier than I wanted to. Will his price rises over the next few rounds be worth the 2 trades??

I am bringing him in , injuries and HIA,s these days ya never know whats gonna happen - from what I have seen so far wish I had started with him Kudos to those that did

I was bringing in Hosking too, but I must admit I've moved away from it.

I'm not bringing in either Hosking or Lussick and I'm worried it could end up being a bad move, but I'm hoping to make moves better for the long game rather than a quick cash grab. No idea if it's the "right" move.

Bringing in galvin Elliot and lussick this week for cash already got the likes of may and hosking

code delta wrote:Was bringing in Hosking for his increase in price but being named on the bench means trading him out earlier than I wanted to. Will his price rises over the next few rounds be worth the 2 trades??

I'm undecided based on the last two seasons, where he seems to pass the eye test with flying colours (scores very well in fantasy in the process), then seems to drift in and out of the team.

I don't get it, the bloke pumps out almost a Yeo type consistency/quality mix whenever he gets an opportunity and then eventually gets dropped.
Horse still not back either, which is a worry.

That all said, I'll probably bring him in.
Papa and Whitehead getting on and every chance of missing a week or two occasionally.
Plus they have some loose cannons in Young and Horse that are high risk prospects.

I'm bringing Hosking in. Not playing him though. He's a cash cow that just costs more to get initially. 2-3 weeks of price rises and then move out or play him if he jags a starting spot. Low risk, plus with finefuki as a stepping stone, easy milked cow hoskings is

I'm using my trade boost & doing & have 205k bank:
B. Smith out - J. Lussick in
Wong out - Hopgood in
Luki out - A. Elliott in

time to be aggressive imo

White Lightning wrote:I'm using my trade boost & doing & have 205k bank:
B. Smith out - J. Lussick in
Wong out - Hopgood in
Luki out - A. Elliott in

time to be aggressive imo

What are you going to do about Haas?
.

I used a boost too. I'm still holding Haas, but he will have to go next week

If you haven't already, activate your 14 day free trial for the assistant coach feature via the website

Boost used for me too.

Levi to Lussick was an easy one. Grant cover is a bonus.
Wong to Curran cuz I like Curran and don't have Luki. Will make a bit of money and hopefully keep scoring 50+.
Haas to AFB cuz I just want a gun in that spot and my only Warrior was Tuapiki so why not

DCE to Hynes was on the cards but can't get the dollars and positions to work so it can wait.

I'll do Levi to Api next week.
This week it's
Piakura to Hosking
SJ to Fog
Haas toTino

You're not allowed to look at this if your are playing me in a h2h league

I have the C on Hopgood and VC on cleary. If I switch Wong and his red dot for Hopgood so Wong is C and put the R on Hopgood do I fet Cleary's 93 as VC ?

No Worries wrote:I have the C on Hopgood and VC on cleary. If I switch Wong and his red dot for Hopgood so Wong is C and put the R on Hopgood do I fet Cleary's 93 as VC ?

Yes you'll get Cleary as C

Tigs wrote:

Yes you'll get Cleary as C

And doesn't he also then get the lowest score from other NPR? That's the potential downside?

code delta wrote:
And doesn't he also then get the lowest score from other NPR? That's the potential downside?

Yep thats correct

Tigs wrote:

code delta wrote:
And doesn't he also then get the lowest score from other NPR? That's the potential downside?

Yep thats correct

Brooks, Savage, Hutchinson, VFifita & Hughes - so as long as one of them scores less than 2X the gap between Hopgood & Cleary I win ? Seems like a good bet

No Worries wrote:

Brooks, Savage, Hutchinson, VFifita & Hughes - so as long as one of them scores less than 2X the gap between Hopgood & Cleary I win ? Seems like a good bet

Good luck with VFitita