NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 34 - Nana Nana Nana Nana Nanai!

robelgordo wrote:Dragons - Kerr out, Gurgess starts in 2022 lol (but the Raiders pack is apparently reserve grade level…), Woods to bench. MCGuire also playing edge with Sims on bench

Roosters - Tauk ahead of JWH, Butcher at lock ahead of Radley. The rotation there is gonna be interesting - Roosters don’t seem to have enough minutes to go around for their forward depth.

Ended up at the zoo, gonna be racing back to get home by 4pm. Think I’ll probably lose that one.

WT Winfield wrote:

Say hi to the Tigers for me thanks mate

robelgordo wrote:

Saw the Tigers. And a Rooster. Not much else doing NRL wise

Revraiser wrote:

This has been the life of Chad, unheralded and under appreciated by some at the Sharks, he was the backbone for many a win and game swing for years. Some just can't see a good player unless they score 2 tries and make 65 tackles with 200 metres

mattnz wrote:

Was just the flu (and a chance to rest the weight on the shoulders he was carrying for the team).

I have to say though, Seyfarth looks like a gun EDG when he gets a chance. Scores of 54 and 59 as starting EDG, almost all base stats.

Dunning-Kruger wrote:Imagine running a forum where you can be banned for using the upvote/downvote system? Imagine actually functioning on that level? Then imagine being one of the hive-minded weaklings that support that kind of behaviour?
Make sure you don't downvote attention seeking, or bullying, or drunken bullshit, because you might find yourselves banned from this sad little group of weasels.

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

Watching him in person it's easier to see why he belongs in first grade. Never stops talking and always directing guys around off the ball. Poor teams have to over pay to get quality first graders and if you can't get the rep quality players (Hunt to Dragons for slightly overs) I don't see a problem with paying for guys that can lead you to the finals. Sure you aren't gonna win a comp paying Townsend 800k but it's the kind of move that wins regular season games, builds a culture and keeps the young guys interested

Dunning-Kruger wrote:Imagine running a forum where you can be banned for using the upvote/downvote system? Imagine actually functioning on that level? Then imagine being one of the hive-minded weaklings that support that kind of behaviour?
Make sure you don't downvote attention seeking, or bullying, or drunken bullshit, because you might find yourselves banned from this sad little group of weasels.

Dunning-Kruger wrote:Imagine running a forum where you can be banned for using the upvote/downvote system? Imagine actually functioning on that level? Then imagine being one of the hive-minded weaklings that support that kind of behaviour?
Make sure you don't downvote attention seeking, or bullying, or drunken bullshit, because you might find yourselves banned from this sad little group of weasels.

Dunning-Kruger wrote:Imagine running a forum where you can be banned for using the upvote/downvote system? Imagine actually functioning on that level? Then imagine being one of the hive-minded weaklings that support that kind of behaviour?
Make sure you don't downvote attention seeking, or bullying, or drunken bullshit, because you might find yourselves banned from this sad little group of weasels.

Dunning-Kruger wrote:Imagine running a forum where you can be banned for using the upvote/downvote system? Imagine actually functioning on that level? Then imagine being one of the hive-minded weaklings that support that kind of behaviour?
Make sure you don't downvote attention seeking, or bullying, or drunken bullshit, because you might find yourselves banned from this sad little group of weasels.

Dunning-Kruger wrote:Imagine running a forum where you can be banned for using the upvote/downvote system? Imagine actually functioning on that level? Then imagine being one of the hive-minded weaklings that support that kind of behaviour?
Make sure you don't downvote attention seeking, or bullying, or drunken bullshit, because you might find yourselves banned from this sad little group of weasels.

Dunning-Kruger wrote:Imagine running a forum where you can be banned for using the upvote/downvote system? Imagine actually functioning on that level? Then imagine being one of the hive-minded weaklings that support that kind of behaviour?
Make sure you don't downvote attention seeking, or bullying, or drunken bullshit, because you might find yourselves banned from this sad little group of weasels.