HomeWhat’s the consensus with Radley? Is a Radley/Mahoney combination too risky?
NRL Fantasy 2019 Part 12
Fortitude- Posts : 4618
Reputation : 2678
Join date : 2016-02-25
Location : National Capital
Liverpool_Bulldog- Fanatic
- Posts : 18397
Reputation : 6298
Join date : 2016-02-14
Location : New Zealand
Any thoughts on what Moylan and Wighton might realistically average.
Looking for a bit of variety at WFB? Mainly interested in Moylan
Looking for a bit of variety at WFB? Mainly interested in Moylan
Camo123- Fanatic
- Posts : 12271
Reputation : 8911
Join date : 2019-01-30
Imagine there was no unlimited trades before R1
How screwed would we be
How screwed would we be
Vanish- Posts : 482
Reputation : 137
Join date : 2017-03-29
lukeaye wrote:
yeah i'm not sure mannnnnnn. It's tempting, but honestly i think Lane is a better option. If he gets 80 at least.
I like Lane but I can't afford to move Gillett into him without downgrading elsewhere.
I definitely need to find a better WFB than Mansour.
Krump- Posts : 8454
Reputation : 4770
Join date : 2015-07-31
Location : Your mums room
Thats if you count rd 6 where he finally came good. If he takes a while to warm up again then you'll be second guessing yourself for weeks because you've paid a premium for him. I know this because I started him last year and traded him after rd5Iron Mike wrote:
Average of 51. If that's the worst he is going to do then I'm happy just has to have a run of 60+ games and you are laughing.
He did start well the year before though so maybe it's my own confirmation bias warning me off him.
Last edited by Krump on Tue Mar 12, 2019 12:00 pm; edited 1 time in total
standard-issue- Moderator
- Posts : 19232
Reputation : 9463
Join date : 2015-08-03
Age : 28
Fortitude wrote:What’s the consensus with Radley? Is a Radley/Mahoney combination too risky?
Vanish- Posts : 482
Reputation : 137
Join date : 2017-03-29
Fortitude wrote:What’s the consensus with Radley? Is a Radley/Mahoney combination too risky?
I don't think there's a consensus, but I like him. Averaged 43.7 at lock last year, priced at 33. Seems like safe value, even if he only averages around 40.
I have Radley and Mahoney in my 17, but I also have Macca.
Iron Mike- Posts : 811
Reputation : 300
Join date : 2019-01-25
At this stage I have no Broncos, Storm, Raiders or Roosters. Not really that surprised given the depth in the forward packs of these sides it's been hard to choose a sure thing.
Forgoing Teddy and CNK may be a mistake but happy to run without in the hope that Watson, Dedwards and RTS
Tapine and Chricton will come into consideration no doubt.
Forgoing Teddy and CNK may be a mistake but happy to run without in the hope that Watson, Dedwards and RTS
Tapine and Chricton will come into consideration no doubt.
my tv broke- Fanatics Immortal
- Posts : 27211
Reputation : 19515
Join date : 2016-01-08
my tv broke wrote:For anyone still considering him (heart says yes, head says no).
Chris Garry
@ChrisGarry7
Pangai jnr training strongly at Broncos. Looks certain to play.
re Gillett
ya boy usman is back????
@heapsdrunk·
Any thoughts on how Gillett is used? Start middle, shift to edge?
Chris Garry
@ChrisGarry7
Replying to
@heapsdrunk
Yeah that’s it. He will play edge when Pangai comes in.
Guest- Guest
Iron Mike wrote:At this stage I have no Broncos, Storm, Raiders or Roosters. Not really that surprised given the depth in the forward packs of these sides it's been hard to choose a sure thing.
Forgoing Teddy and CNK may be a mistake but happy to run without in the hope that Watson, Dedwards and RTS
Tapine and Chricton will come into consideration no doubt.
Tapine and Munster are on the "I wish I could get them in" list.
I have both of them in supercoach though, and Radley
Iron Mike- Posts : 811
Reputation : 300
Join date : 2019-01-25
Krump wrote:
Thats if you count rd 6 where he finally came good. If he takes a while to warm up again then you'll be second guessing yourself for weeks because you've paid a premium for him. I know this because I started him last year and traded him after rd5
He did start well the year before though so maybe it's my own confirmation bias warning me off him.
You did say look at his first 6 rounds. I'm just not sure he gets much cheaper than $821K this year, last year he was $914K to start the year so passed but I see locking him in now as saving a trade. Plays round 12 so whatever he gets that round is obviously a bonus.
Revraiser- Fanatic
- Posts : 16116
Reputation : 8723
Join date : 2015-10-21
Location : Sydney
Fortitude wrote:What’s the consensus with Radley? Is a Radley/Mahoney combination too risky?
Revs running those two plus Tevaga to start the season.
Guest- Guest
my tv broke wrote:
re Gillett
ya boy usman is back????
@heapsdrunk·
Any thoughts on how Gillett is used? Start middle, shift to edge?
Chris Garry
@ChrisGarry7
Replying to
@heapsdrunk
Yeah that’s it. He will play edge when Pangai comes in.
Who is Chris Garry and why do i care about his opinion?
Not trying to be rude, just gauging the quality of his comments.
Krump- Posts : 8454
Reputation : 4770
Join date : 2015-07-31
Location : Your mums room
Tempting. I think there's enough value around to wait and see on him coming back from such a serious injury though.my tv broke wrote:
re Gillett
ya boy usman is back????
@heapsdrunk·
Any thoughts on how Gillett is used? Start middle, shift to edge?
Chris Garry
@ChrisGarry7
Replying to
@heapsdrunk
Yeah that’s it. He will play edge when Pangai comes in.
Milchcow- Moderator
- Posts : 24641
Reputation : 17056
Join date : 2015-07-31
Even if Gillett does not start the season at full fitness, he'll almost certainly start at better than his breakeven.
So if you want him best to get on him early, even if it takes him a while to get up to speed.
Liverpool_Bulldog- Fanatic
- Posts : 18397
Reputation : 6298
Join date : 2016-02-14
Location : New Zealand
Thoughts on Moylan this year.
Thinking of running Edwards, Moylan and CNK?
Thinking of running Edwards, Moylan and CNK?
mattnz- Fanatic
- Posts : 19164
Reputation : 6813
Join date : 2018-03-11
Rapture_NRL wrote:
What do you predict the minutes and rotation will be? Who have they brought in to cover Haas on the bench?
Flegler, lucky to get 20 mins
my tv broke- Fanatics Immortal
- Posts : 27211
Reputation : 19515
Join date : 2016-01-08
lukeaye wrote:
Who is Chris Garry and why do i care about his opinion?
Not trying to be rude, just gauging the quality of his comments.
Has basically been the #1 Broncos journo for a number of years. His info on them is generally correct (doesn't tend to deal in rumours like the Pete Badel's/etc)
Last edited by my tv broke on Tue Mar 12, 2019 12:08 pm; edited 1 time in total
Guest- Guest
Iron Mike wrote:
Why is this so funny? I struggle to see how he scores more the 45-47 being on an edge. You just have to look at his stats.
What I find funny is you saying that you will pass on Mahoney and that he's not value. Now that's funny.
I’ll bet you whatever you want that James gets more total points than Arrow this year. Again. To say that James will average no more than mid 40’s is simply
Sorry if that offends you. Every year they say James is playing on the edge and he invariably ends up playing middle AND edge. People don’t watch games, that’s the problem. They listen to shit on the media. He averaged 52.5 last year and, guess what? He started in the 2nd row. He’ll outscore the low minute Arrow for sure.Mahoney is too expensive and will put out what he’s priced at imo. People are getting him for a backup hooker, but he reminds me of my Pritchard pick last year, which was admittedly shitful. He’ll have big boppers running at him all day and he misses tackles like a champ. There is far better value elsewhere and without him I get a front three of Cook, Tapau and Fifita, plus an extremely strong second row, whoever I want in the halves with Brown, the same centres and FBs as everyone else. No biggie. I’m pretty sure they’ll make up for no Mahoney. If I’m wrong I’ll bring Mahoney in later on. Good luck for the year. I’ll remind you of James V Arrow later on in the year
Guest- Guest
my tv broke wrote:
Has basically been the #1 Broncos journo for a number of years. His info on them is generally correct (doesn't tend to deal in rumours like the Pete Badel's/etc)
Cheers, ok. So reliable.
Interesting