NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Weiland wrote:At this stage I am doing 2 pretty unexciting trades , Gossie to Martin and Cogger to Brimson. Gives me 300 grand ITB for the upcoming upgrades I need to make but I am thinking about holding off on Brimson for a week, I am down to 18 and don't want to trade in another failed cow but the extra cash it gives me is very tempting.
Loomer wrote: How much over BE do people think Brimson will score that he can't wait a week??
Loomer wrote:
I would've thought people that got Cogger would've learnt their lesson rather than queuing up to get Brimson
StormTrooper96 wrote:I really want to bring in Tolo this week because I feel he will just keep going up now. I have been talked out of RFM > Tolo but how does JFH > Tolo sound?
I know JFH has a BE of 38 and is a borderline keeper but he has only really been hitting around 48-50 bar one 59 performance when he made 50 tackles in RD 4. If he sticks around 45-50 he is set to only make another 45-72K (655K-682K) plus he is RD 17 player so misses RD 13. Tolo is going to keep making money and he plays RD 13 plus is a GUN. Thoughts?
fullbacks are generally decent tacklers? i hope he doesnt get steamrolled like elgey/cartwright.Milchcow wrote:Brimson was apparently the front runner to be Titans fullback this year before they signed Gordon.
Also, he'll get at least 2 weeks (but probably more) in the role. No way they chuck him in against Melbourne then dump him if he doesn't perform
wolfking wrote:How does he score significantly more than Elgey? Unless he has rock solid defence Taylor there doing most the kicking and being the dominant playmaker.
Loomer wrote: How much over BE do people think Brimson will score that he can't wait a week??
ive got barnett pencilled in as well, but he is a bit of an awkward one at second row. in 9 games 2016 he produced low scores of 28,31,37 but also highs of 58,75,80 (50avg overall).mattnz wrote:
Yes Barnett is in this week.
Fortitude wrote:IM thoroughly enjoying the fact that the discussion is branching out a bit more to include some PODS. Groups of people with opposing views on who to bring in. Will really shake up the ladder I think, cant really on everyone having basically the same team with a cheeky one or two pods.
Home
Loomer