2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 37

Bren wrote:
Use some common sense for once you knob. Just because I asked people to confirm it doesnt mean I asked them to do it! They can confirm it in other ways like checking Renegades Facebook page and see if others are doing it / posting about it.

Maybe think before you open your big fat gob next time you dip shit.

Apparently you knew how to find the answer, why didn't you do that yourself ?

Bugger SST losing 5 points.  They didn't go down his side hardly at all so fair enough.  He should be solid through the next two byes at least.

In regards to Mitchell, on Fox they said that it wasn't too bad and he was even possibly going to come back on but due to the conditions they were cautious and left him out of the game.  See what happens.

Also, Mannering gonna be a steal this week.  I need to get more Round 15 players.

JWH looks tempting too.

Move on, guys. Nothing will come of your back-and-forth except a quicker route to the page 51 party.

Not sure if I am in the party mood

filthridden wrote:Move on, guys. Nothing will come of your back-and-forth except a quicker route to the page 51 party.

I thought I'd miss the party last night when I went to bed on page 47.

http://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/teams/roosters/roosters-star-blake-ferguson-could-return-to-fullback-with-latrell-mitchell-injured/news-story/e4d3f9c398d9880c26fc870de38dea4f

just saw this, looks like he is out for a few weeks. Probably a trade.

The Mitchell injury at least solves my "who to sell out of my back 4" Nelly and Kelly. I might even snag a half, it's just a matter of which one

Mithcell to Tedesco as popular as Fensom/Parker ---> James?

not enough people on this time of day for a page 51 party

New thread time.

filthridden wrote:I don't think people understand that NRL fantasy is a business and most likely the main thing they care about is more clicks on their websites for advertising revenue.

They will not wipe teams because they will lose a significant amount of clicks from people not returning to the site.

They will lose more players (and clicks) if they allow people to sub in players that have already played.

If they just chuck it in the too hard basket to fix, it will be more than just Rabbit who leaves. 2 fuckups in 3 years is not a good track record.


They have a heap of people who get pissed off about the captaincy loophole, and that is in the rules. Letting people do stuff that's not in the rules is a terrible strategy.

Your Name wrote:

Apparently you knew how to find the answer, why didn't you do that yourself ?

Notice the part where I said Im not on Facebook or cant you read?