2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 9

chitmunkey wrote:I read an article today where Cartwright reckons he won't be playing 80, probably closer to 60. do you think his still worth it? I was picking him based on 80

http://m.nrl.com/fit-again-cartwright-ready-to-go-in-2016/tabid/10874/newsid/93346/default.aspx

Finch wrote:

For me personally its a no. Burgess x2 still have to come back which should move Surgess back to 2nd Row/Lock. Grevs + Clark have all started in the past in the 2nd row so theres too much going on there for my liking. I would probably take the gamble if he was $130K, but for the extra 40K you kind of want him to be safe in his position. Its definitely not the worst choice ever though.

Cruise Elroy wrote:

Okay yeah that's a no brainer.

But looking at his forward pack the only keepers are really Surgess and Merrin, that's 2/10. Surely you want 3 or 4 keepers that you won't need to touch.

SportAL wrote:

Reports are the Roosters were pushing for 2-4 match ban but I think the NRL are pushing for 8-12.  So I'm banking on 6-8 and whilst I was hesitant on JNik I have bought him in.  I am a massive Bronco fan and I won't be picking Eden.  Reed is apparently named in the Ressies this week for his comeback match from injury so maybe Eden is there on form, but it's too risky for me.  I'd move Feeney to WFB and bring in JNik.  Trade him out as soon as Pearce is back for TMM or whoever else pops up in the meantime.

Mearcats wrote:Beat me Welshy...

Milchcow wrote:

PGC had 1 player in his forward pack that he never touched (Parker)

Everyone else got traded out

Whether he won despite that or because of that, I don't believe it is a necessity to have 4-5 keepers to start the year

White Lightning wrote:So who's in the lone scout team. Anyone want to post it. Thanks.

Mearcats wrote:

Thanks for the replay Al but don't you feel that if this is the case for both parties (Eden and JNiko) then you would be better of leaving them both and saving a trade? Take someone else?

Bren wrote:
Welshy posted it a couple of pages back lad.

Sashamaloo wrote:
What .......

Parker good for 60, regularly gets 70-80points
17th player with Parker - 20 points
Total 80-100
Roberts might get 50 one week 20 the next
Whitehead most people will be happy if he gets 45.
Total 70 - 90

Therefore don't downgrade

Milchcow wrote:

Guess you had David Stagg in your team whilst he was at the Broncos

White Lightning wrote:

Cheers. That team is almost the same as mine bar a couple of tweeks.

GreenMachine wrote:

For such a good judge you're off your head

Losing me on the personality stakes. Mod stuff getting to you

Mighty Fishes wrote:
Just stuff I heard from the Broncos training. Just going to watch the first few rounds. I hope im wrong

multiple.scoregasms wrote:Somehow managed to get shafted from leagues again. Must have done something to upset SI
Happy to just join the SUG(FUG?) if its too late to get another league together and that is allowed?