NRL Fantasy 2021 - Part 11 - Hookers as far as I can see

Stats, Breakevens and more
https://footystatistics.com/

2021 Community team voting
https://www.nrlfantasyfanatics.com/t1533-community-team-starting-squad


2021 Team planner
https://www.mediafire.com/file/u09fg5pzhyevvbg/2021+Team+Planner+v1.0.xlsm/file

2019 + 2020 NSW Cup stats
https://www.mediafire.com/file/6oybz9w0tu2gl8r/2019+NSW+Cup+stats.xlsm/file

StormTrooper96 wrote:Not seeing much love for Waddell? How is his JS? Average of 46.3 at 2RF and priced at 32.

Only 80K more than Host and probably the better player in an up and coming team.

Not sure on his job security and his average last season between 30-70 min games is 31.6 and will he play 80 mins every week?

Lucky storm plays first...have a weird feeling that Smoothy might be in the 17 which makes the Cheese no go.....

michaelz101 wrote:Lucky storm plays first...have a weird feeling that Smoothy might be in the 17 which makes the Cheese no go.....

Who does he replace on bench? Surely not Hynes

Where's the Milf party?

According to previous thread re: Waddell – I wish I knew if he would be playing 80 minutes… It appears Barrett wants a bench hooker this year (JMK/Katoa when JMK back) then Napa and Renouf and RFM on the bench, all look to be taking middle minutes?

Loomer wrote:

Who does he replace on bench? Surely not Hynes

Would be Lewis

OK I just swapped Lam for Milf... now to join the league of extraordinary Milf owners

StormTrooper96 wrote:According to previous thread re: Waddell – I wish I knew if he would be playing 80 minutes… It appears Barrett wants a bench hooker this year (JMK/Katoa when JMK back) then Napa and Renouf  and RFM on the bench, all look to be taking middle minutes?  

Wouldnt RFM play edge? and if he did play middle he probably will push josh Jackson onto the edge. I don't think Barret will play 2 80 minute edges even with a backup hooker

Just to refer to a post from the previous thread.

You should definitely start Turpin and have Liddle bench.

For any 2 players in your scoring 17, start whichever one plays first. That way if you want to utilise rolling lockout you have more flexibility in the replacement.

If Liddle is a late withdrawal, or you otherwise get cold feet, much easier to replace him if he is 14-17 rather than starting 9.

14-17 should be the players who play last during the round, if possible.

Loomer wrote:

Not sure on his job security and his average last season between 30-70 min games is 31.6 and will he play 80 mins every week?

Waddell is clearly going to play more than 30 minutes as a starting edge.

Whether RFM takes that spot off him in future weeks is another question, but his minutes are safe this week.

Milchcow wrote:
Just to refer to a post from the previous thread.

You should definitely start Turpin and have Liddle bench.

For any 2 players in your scoring 17, start whichever one plays first. That way if you want to utilise rolling lockout you have more flexibility in the replacement.

If Liddle is a late withdrawal, or you otherwise get cold feet, much easier to replace him if he is 14-17 rather than starting 9.

14-17 should be the players who play last during the round, if possible.

Eh logic is there. but makes my bench look weaker so ill pass

Damn those Storm statues are bad. Iif you haven't seen Cam Smith google that shit !!

Brandon or Welch?

Numbers say Brandon, security says Welch or look somewhere else for the last MID spot

Milchcow wrote:

Waddell is clearly going to play more than 30 minutes as a starting edge.

Whether RFM takes that spot off him in future weeks is another question, but his minutes are safe this week.

Waddell has been on my radar all pre season and I'm now considering going back to him instead of Siliti. I'm basically taking two punts in my side, one is Milford and the other is that last spot. The extra cash getting Waddell does allow a little bit more cash either in the kitty or on position #21 too..

Sitili more for boom/bust scoring potential and plays in a top side. Potential break out year.
Waddell higher workrate but can be a rocks/diamonds type of player and has more pressure on his spot.

King Assassin wrote:

Eh logic is there. but makes my bench look weaker so ill pass

I guess scoring 40 with a starter and 50 from the bench is much better than scoring 50 as starter and 40 on the bench

Good decision.

King Assassin wrote:

Eh logic is there. but makes my bench look weaker so ill pass

Listen to Milch mate, swapping them just because it looks better is foolish.

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Brandon or Welch?

Numbers say Brandon, security says Welch or look somewhere else for the last MID spot

I like Welch. Purely because he's cheaper, and has more security at starting prop. Bsmith loses his spot in 5 weeks and goes back to 40 points a game off the bench. Welch will score consistent 50-55 And priced at a touch above 40 should make great cash and wont have to be considered trading out until maybe bye rounds/upgrade in the later weeks

Here's the Wags team - still working on the #thatsmyteam rules.
Every team must be represented in the scoring 17, and no more than 2 players from any one team.
Cook
Harris / Watson / Brown
Riki / Fifita
Cleary / Munster
Averillo / Hammer
Teddy / Moylan / Laurie

Alvaro / Liddle / Simonsson / Gossie / Liddle
Brailey / Niu / Saab / Stefano (yeah I know he becomes the 3rd Tiger, but there's literally no one else at that price)