Loopholers Anonymous - a wretched hive of scum and villainy

Thanks Michy

Hi scumbags,

I purposely cashed out to a Raiders WFB (Niko) as it seems they have a lot of games towards the end of the round.

Looking to check out SJ and RTS score first before I loop them in, thoughts on this setup:

CS9
Haas Fifi
Murray Tolo Taupau
ARey Walters
Nikora Bateman
Ponga Teddy Turbo

Cook MC9 Twal Mahoney
RTS SJ Burns Niko

Conditions:
- If SJ and RTS does well (50 for both SJ and RTS), swap Mahoney out for Niko
- If SJ does well, RTS doesnt, do nothing
- If RTS does well, SJ doesnt, swap Walter out for Ponga, Niko into WFB
- If both do shit, Ponga to Walters, Burns to WFB

That should work right?

@hymenbustas Looks OK to me

You're welcome.

Hey VK,

Maybe something like this:

Smith
Haas Fifita
Taumalolo Twal Taupau
Moses Walter
Nikora Bateman
Tedesco Ponga Turbo

McInnes Cook RTS Mahoney
SST Burns SJ Brittain

If SJ goes HAM, leave as is. If hes shit, Ponga goes to Walter via Burns. If SST scores say 50, swap Mahoney with Brittain/Walter.

Looks like I'm looping in Staggs with a score of 65, but for who?

Only reasonable options are for Murray, Matterson, or SJ.

Probably safest to take Staggs over SJ, only thing making me consider others is the fact he could go big verse the Warriors.

Murray has been underwhelming of late though..

@Verbal Kint wrote:

I'd be sitting SJ or Murray. Probably leaning towards Murray as I think there is a chance SJ goes BOOM this week

Yeah I've set up to leave out Murray.

Got a good vibe, on SJ tonight so I'll back my gut and see what happens.

Sidenote- i kinda fucked up with Coates. He obviously locks out at the same time as Staggs, which is not helpful for future looping

@my tv broke wrote:Looks like I'm looping in Staggs with a score of 65, but for who?

Only reasonable options are for Murray, Matterson, or SJ.

Probably safest to take Staggs over SJ, only thing making me consider others is the fact he could go big verse the Warriors.

Murray has been underwhelming of late though..

Yep. Pulled the wrong trigger here. Cost me points

Hey guys.

If i start Fifi in frf and have a red dot at 17, will  receive both Twal 18 and JFH 19 scores ?

@Khany wrote:Hey guys.

If i start Fifi in frf and have a red dot at 17, will  receive both Twal 18 and JFH 19 scores ?

Yes.

If there is a FRF in 14-16, then technically they will replace Fifita, and Twal will replace that person but either way you'll get Twal and JFH's score (this might be important if you are trying to loop)

Thanks mate

Can someone please have a look at this and confirm/deny my logic. Trying to work out how to "complex" loop and its doing my head in. May as well try?!

I'm trying to figure out if I can "choose" two of SJ/Xerri/Staggs (even though I figure SJ should score alright).

Set up
HLF: Moses, Walters
WFB: Teddy, Tommy, Milford
Bench
#16: RTS
#17: Staggs
#18: Xerri
#19: Coates
#20: SJ

With the current lineup, I get SJ's score (because of Walters), and Xerri is set up to loop with Staggs (leave as is if Xerri scores well, swap Coates and Staggs, to get Staggs score if Xerri sucks).

If SJ scores like a busted, swap Milford and RTS, so that Milford replaces Walters. If this is the case, then I'm getting both Staggs and Xerri score. Obvs Staggs could score rubbish too, so would only bin SJ's score if its really bad (eg sub 30)

Makes sense?

Makes too much sense. There's karma written all over that. Someone's going down in warm up Walters will play 5 min off the bench for a -2

@No Worries wrote:Makes too much sense. There's karma written all over that. Someone's going down in warm up Walters will play 5 min off the bench for a -2

It feels dirty. I might revert to plan A (just put SJ in his usual spot)

@my tv broke wrote:Can someone please have a look at this and confirm/deny my logic. Trying to work out how to "complex" loop and its doing my head in. May as well try?!

I'm trying to figure out if I can "choose" two of SJ/Xerri/Staggs (even though I figure SJ should score alright).

Set up
HLF: Moses, Walters
WFB: Teddy, Tommy, Milford
Bench
#16: RTS
#17: Staggs
#18: Xerri
#19: Coates
#20: SJ

With the current lineup, I get SJ's score (because of Walters), and Xerri is set up to loop with Staggs (leave as is if Xerri scores well, swap Coates and Staggs, to get Staggs score if Xerri sucks).

If SJ scores like a busted, swap Milford and RTS, so that Milford replaces Walters. If this is the case, then I'm getting both Staggs and Xerri score. Obvs Staggs could score rubbish too, so would only bin SJ's score if its really bad (eg sub 30)

Makes sense?

Wouldn't you need Coates at 17 and Staggs at 19 if you wanted to loop between Xerri & Staggs