2017 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 50

Onthebeatpete wrote:

Yeah the app says Crichton points as 242 but the webpage doesn't. Assuming I did it right lol

The app shows 242 but the total team score is still wrong. Man that app has pissed me off recently.

Onthebeatpete wrote:

Yeah the app says Crichton points as 242 but the webpage doesn't. Assuming I did it right lol

Yep you did it right. As long as you have 4 reserves & your captain is in your npr's.

White Lightning wrote:

I posted a couple of hours before lockout that there was an unconfirmed rumour that Surgess was out. Even though it was unconfirmed I posted it for people who were thinking of buying Surgess because I saw a couple of previous posts reflecting this. The guy that posted it on facebook re sc addicts apparently was a very reliable source especially re Souths & has never been wrong. He knew the training staff & has reliable contacts at other clubs.

That was a good tip WL, you did god, but for the media not to get on top of this story from Tue means his injury was well covered up. I feel for the punters more then anything.

So my last trade today will be buying Munster but who should I sell:
(a) Abbey wfb (leaves 7k bank) or
(b) Klokstad dpp hlf/wfb (leaves 65k bank)

I have Walker in the halves & the reason I threw up the question is although Klokstad is the obvious one to sell it would be handy having 3 dpp hlf/wfb's (Walker, Munsters, Klokstad) so I could use Klokstad to move Walker & Munster around. Also Klokstad still may get a couple of games at the Warriors if there are injuries. Cheers.

bluetige wrote:

That was a good tip WL, you did god, but for the media not to get on top of this story from Tue means his injury was well covered up. I feel for the punters more then anything.

Not even the bookies knew so it was well covered up. Someone posted on sc addicts that even a half hour before teamlists the odds hadn't really changed at all.

White Lightning wrote:So my last trade today will be buying Munster but who should I sell:
(a) Abbey wfb (leaves 7k bank) or
(b) Klokstad dpp hlf/wfb (leaves 65k bank)

I have Walker in the halves & the reason I threw up the question is although Klokstad is the obvious one to sell it would be handy having 3 dpp hlf/wfb's (Walker, Munsters, Klokstad) so I could use Klokstad to move Walker & Munster around. Also Klokstad still may get a couple of games at the Warriors if there are injuries. Cheers.

Tough one as Abbey won't play again this year probably but CNK will only play if there's an injury. Vatuvei is also in the picture now so who gets chosen if there's an injury is a mystery. Depends if you need the extra cash or not really.

White Lightning wrote:So my last trade today will be buying Munster but who should I sell:
(a) Abbey wfb (leaves 7k bank) or
(b) Klokstad dpp hlf/wfb (leaves 65k bank)

I have Walker in the halves & the reason I threw up the question is although Klokstad is the obvious one to sell it would be handy having 3 dpp hlf/wfb's (Walker, Munsters, Klokstad) so I could use Klokstad to move Walker & Munster around. Also Klokstad still may get a couple of games at the Warriors if there are injuries. Cheers.

I would go Abbey. You know that useless waste of space isn't a chance at another game this year. CNK has DPP which is a benefit even if he doesn't play again but if Warriors lose a few on the trot he could be in

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Have gone Brailey to McInnes. Maybe I should go Friend to McInnes and try get the extra points... Since I didn't VC Crichton. Worth it, or sour grapes?

Think about this one for a second mate....

Are you then going to trade McInnes back to Friend for r18?

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Have gone Brailey to McInnes. Maybe I should go Friend to McInnes and try get the extra points... Since I didn't VC Crichton. Worth it, or sour grapes?

Poor trades only compound missing out on Crichton. Sit tight with Brailey>McInnes

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

I would go Abbey. You know that useless waste of space isn't a chance at another game this year. CNK has DPP which is a benefit even if he doesn't play again but if Warriors lose a few on the trot he could be in

Actually while you're online cheers for the Crichton vc tip. I remember your post when you said Crichton would score a try running at the weak defensive Titans halves. Ever since that post a couple of days ago I had the vc on Crichton. Better still I vc'ed Crichton in sc.

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Have gone Brailey to McInnes. Maybe I should go Friend to McInnes and try get the extra points... Since I didn't VC Crichton. Worth it, or sour grapes?

Brailey could get 20 so hell no.

White Lightning wrote:

Actually while you're online cheers for the Crichton vc tip. I remember your post when you said Crichton would score a try running at the weak defensive Titans halves. Ever since that post a couple of days ago I had the vc on Crichton. Better still I vc'ed Crichton in sc.

Thought he would have the best chance at a high score from my VC options but not even in my wildest dreams did I imagine that happening

Brailey for a 50 tonight.........

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

Thought he would have the best chance at a high score from my VC options but not even in my wildest dreams did I imagine that happening

Yeah he had one of those games you dream about. That last try blew my mind. I always pay special interest with all your posts mate because your fantasy knowledge is right up there.

wolfking wrote:Brailey for a 50 tonight.........

I can see that happening but the only worry is if Mortimer stays in the 17.

With only 11 playing this week the Crichton loophole has really helped.

White Lightning wrote:With only 11 playing this week the Crichton loophole has really helped.

It really is like having an extra player