NRLFF 5% Pod League

I made one small change and now have zero in the bank. Perfect team imo haha

I think a simple self check prior to trade in should suffice. If you miss the boat too bad, move onto the next best disappointment opportunity.

Welshy wrote:Guys this was made as a bit of fun to involve a few different players from the usual format

As stated from the start, it’s a bit of an honesty system with pretty much the only rule being not trading in or starting with a player over the % threshold

It’s nothing serious and shouldn’t be treated as such

Agree, it's everyone's competitiveness coming out - which is kinda cool.

I got it. Check this team Tuesday arvo and set before looking at your own team and we'll all be sweet.

easytiger wrote:

Agree, it's everyone's competitiveness coming out - which is kinda cool.

we're all just missing our survivor fix from last year...

Jele wrote:

we're all just missing our survivor fix from last year...

Ha. I had the same thought truthfully.

I knew picking Croker would lead to disappointment, yet I still did it.

wolfking wrote:I knew picking Croker would lead to disappointment, yet I still did it.

Unfortunately the talented Croker is at 6% ownership and is not a POD

Milchcow wrote:

Unfortunately the talented Croker is at 6% ownership and is not a POD

Says 3.5%?

Think you're talking about two different Crokers.

Assume Wolfy has a milk Croker

I pretty much based my guns around guys I thought would be above the ownership threshold by lock out next week meaning that most wouldn't be able to grab them. Little annoying if everyone can swoop in and pick up Ponga, Turbo, Haas etc but we aren't exactly playing for sheep stations

Few left in play today and currently sitting 4th. Think I'm going to take the 18th man loop in this one and bank a 35 over second rower with no fantasy history

wolfking wrote:I knew picking Croker would lead to disappointment, yet I still did it.

I took both Raiders centres because they were cheapest with job security. Don't even look at that waste land of a position

629 with 6 to play. My dross might sneak me to 900

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

I took both Raiders centres because they were cheapest with job security. Don't even look at that waste land of a position

I have the dream combo of May and Taulagi. I under thought it

my choice of centre wasn't the 'Best' option I must say.

573 with 6 to go

616 with 5 to go

718, with McCullough, Condon, Waddell, Drinkwater to go

All players left to play are all locked, can't update my team

645 with 6 to play, but stuck with Murchie as the system won't let me trade him to anyone.